Study

Where would you like to connect?

Planning case
Point of interconnection
Line
Tap point, miles from the station
mi
Both circuits tapped
Contingency categories, NERC TPL-001
N-1-1 prior outages
Generator
Transformer
Line
Autotransformer
DC tie
DC ties as prior outages
Model
Bus sections split by open breakers
Queued projects
Co-located units
TSP contingency lists
Study area
Study area by
County radius from the POI county
Counties
Branches from the POI
One-line, substations from the POI
Monitored elements, minimum kV
kV
Dispatch
Transfer sink
Generation dispatched to Pmax, branches from the POI
off
Dispatch level, % of Pmax
GSF dispatch cutoff, %
Storage while the project injects
Storage while the project withdraws
Ratings
System-intact rating
Line loading basis
Rating set
The five posted ratings, MVA
Contingency classes judged against it
Rating applied to each contingency class
P1 single element
P2 bus or breaker fault
P4 stuck breaker
P5 protection system failure
P7 common tower
N-A-1
N-1-1
Extreme events screened against
Percent of Rate B
%
Marginal overload band, % above rating
Pre-existing overloads
Screening thresholds
Minimum impact on an element
% of rating
MW of flow
DFAX, % of MW
Voltage, pu
AC voltage analysis
AC contingencies, most
Voltage criteria applied at
Voltage judged, minimum kV
kV
Pre-contingency voltage, pu, and the post-contingency floor and ceiling
Floor
Ceiling
Post-contingency voltage deviation, %
%
Deviation basis
Pre-contingency band applies at
Post-contingency floor and ceiling apply at
Voltage deviation applies at
Taps, phase shifters and switched shunts
Project reactive power
Load power factor
Short circuit
Project type
MVA rating
Fault contribution, pu of rated current
Breaker, kA
Reactance to the POI, pu on the project MVA
An empty box takes the default: the green mark (0.8333) for an inverter project, the case's median for a synchronous one.
Screen reach, buses from the POI
Short-circuit, system-strength and SSR screens
Fault types
Three-phase fault
Single-line-to-ground fault
GSU high-side winding
GSU zero-sequence reactance, pu on the project MVA
Breaker duty checked, buses from the POI
the POI alone
Interrupting ratings
Interrupting rating of every breaker, kA
kA
Interrupting ratings entered per bus
Breaker duty margin, % the rating must exceed the duty by
Gas and vacuum breakers
Oil breakers
Circuit switchers
Fault-current increase >
%
System strength measured
System intact
Worst N-1
Worst N-2
Minimum deliverability
Minimum deliverability check
Planning case
Mitigation
Storage
Off-line covered units
Minimum deliverability level, % of maximum
Project components
Solar, MW
Gas, MW
Load, MW
Project configurations studied
1Load only
2Load and gas
3Load and solar
4Load, gas and solar
5Gas and solar
6Gas only
7Solar only
Project phases
Additional planning cases
Direction
Scenarios
Study-area generation dispatched to Pmax
Queued projects with a signed IA, at full output
00:00

Conditions

    Max injection

    Max withdrawal

    Most loaded elements right now

    Voltage, AC power flow

    Extreme events, no planning criterion

    Minimum deliverability

    Short circuit, system strength and SSR

    ElementMilesMWMVARating% rating% at 0 MWDFAXState

    Financials

    Financials

    Day-ahead forecast

    Legend

    Flow, under 90% of rating 90–100% 100–102%: marginal, inside the method's error Clearly over (pulsing = caused by the project) Out of service Dash speed follows the MW Dashed station: the network continues beyond it Dome: the substation studied, in the colour of its condition

    Map layers

    Equipment
    Outage type
    Year
    Year
    Class
    Fuel
    Dispatch
    Minimum MW
    1 MW
    Shadow price$5 – max
    Pick a day
    Map view
    Year
    Display by
    Map view
    Year
    Display by
    Map view
    Year
    Display by

    Account